Research Productivity on Manuscripts in the field of Social Science (2010-2020). Scopus Database
Palabras clave:
Research Productivity, Authorship Metrics, Manuscripts, Scientometric, Social ScienceResumen
The study aimed to assess and analyze the research productivity on manuscripts in the field of social science on a set of quantitative and qualitative metrics to discover underlying research trends at global, national, organizational and individual level. The study is based on 11 years’ global research data (N=1136) on the topic sourced from Scopus database for the time span 2010-2020. The scientometric analysis used to assess the research productivity. The research productivity on manuscripts registered 17.21 per cent annual average growth and 6.36 per cent compound annual growth rate with an average citation impact of 1.42 citations per paper. The average number of authors per paper was 1.29 and the average productivity per author was 0.79. The resultant data indicates that the degree of collaboration ranges between 0.13≥0.24 and the overall degree of collaboration was 0.17. The Pearson correlation analysis inferred a significant and positive relationship (r = 0.889, N = 11, p =0.000) between number of articles and the number of authors.
Descargas
Citas
Agrawal, O. P. 1984. “Conservation of Manuscripts and Paintings of South-East Asia.” Glasgow :24-25.
Daizadeh, I. (2021). Trademark and patent applications are structurally near-identical and cointegrated: Implications for studies in innovation. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 1(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.33
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). 2020. “Competency Guidelines for Rare Books and Special Collections Professionals.” https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/rare-books-and-manuscripts/rbms-guidelines/competancy-guidelines-for-rbsc-professionals.pdf
Library of Congress. “American Memory: Remaining Collections. Understanding Manuscripts: A Basic Introduction.” https://memory.loc.gov/ammem/awhhtml/awmss5/understanding.html
National Mission for Manuscript (NMM). Ministry of Culture. Government of India. https://www.namami.gov.in/objectives
May, R. M. 1997. “The Scientific Wealth of Nations”. Science 275(5301):793-796.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5301.793
Pandya, M. Y., Joorel, J. P. S. and Solanki, H. 2021. “Research Productivity of Newly Established Central Universities in India.” Annals of Library and Information Studies 68:67-74.
Raval, V. 2016. “Heritage Preservation in Indian Cultural Modern Practice and Their Possible Integration with Special Reference to Manuscripts.” Gujarat, India: Gujarat University. http://hdl.handle.net/10603/186571.
Reymond, D. (2020). Patents information for humanities research: Could there be something?. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 1(1), 006. https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.02
Subramanyam, K. 1983. “Bibliometric Studies of Research Collaboration: A review”. Journal of Information Science 6(1):33-38. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016555158300600105.
Yoshikane, F., Nozawa, T., Shibui, S. and Suzuki, T. 2009. “An Analysis of the Connection between Researchers’ Productivity and their Co-authors’ Past Attributions, including the Importance in Collaboration Networks.” Scientometric 79(2):435–449.
