Dynamics of the Evolution of Science Diplomacy Research (1999–2024)
Abstract
Objective: Analyze the evolution, institutionalization, and diversification of science diplomacy research (1999–2024) through co-word analysis, identifying key phases and thematic shifts.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The study categorizes science diplomacy into three phases:
Foundational Phase (1999–2017): Influenced by post-Cold War dynamics and globalization, with themes like science policy, diplomacy, and technology (e.g., SESAME, Human Genome Project).
Institutionalization Phase (2018–2021): Shaped by crises such as climate change, COVID-19, and geopolitical tensions, emphasizing health diplomacy and Arctic governance.
Maturity Phase (2022–2024): Focuses on digital diplomacy, space diplomacy, and governance of emerging technologies amid global disruptions.
Results/Discussion: Science diplomacy has evolved into an interdisciplinary and adaptive tool for addressing transnational challenges, global crises, and geopolitical instability.
Conclusions: The study highlights the increasing institutionalization of science diplomacy and its role in global governance. Future research should explore its adaptability to emerging global disruptions.
Originality/Value: This study provides a longitudinal perspective on science diplomacy’s evolution, offering insights into its growing relevance in an interconnected world.
Downloads
References
Adams, J. (2013). Collaborations: The fourth age of research. Nature, 497(7451), 557-560. https://doi.org/10.1038/497557a
Adamson, M. (2021). Science Diplomacy at the International Atomic Energy Agency: Isotope Hydrology, Development, and the Establishment of a Technique. Journal of Contemporary History, 56(3), 522-542, Article 0022009421997888. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009421997888
Adamson, M., & Lalli, R. (2021). Global perspectives on science diplomacy: Exploring the diplomacy-knowledge nexus in contemporary histories of science [; Proceedings Paper]. Centaurus, 63(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1600-0498.12369
AlKhaldi, M., James, N., Chattu, V. K., Ahmed, S., Meghari, H., Kaiser, K., Ijsselmuiden, C., & Tanner, M. (2021). Rethinking and strengthening the Global Health Diplomacy through triangulated nexus between policy makers, scientists and the community in light of COVID-19 global crisis [Article]. Global Health Research and Policy, 6(1), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-021-00195-2
Arapostathis, S., & Laborie, L. (2020). Governing Technosciences in the Age of Grand Challenges A European Historical Perspective on the Entanglement of Science, Technology, Diplomacy, and Democracy. Technology and Culture, 61(1), 318-332. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2020.0005
Arsentyeva, I. I. (2022). Transformations of Medical and Vaccine Diplomacies in the COVID-19 Era [Article]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 15(5), 182-207. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-5-86-182-207
Asadi-Lari, M., Teymourlouy, A. A., Maleki, M., & Afshari, M. (2021). Opportunities and challenges of global health diplomacy for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases: a systematic review. Bmc Health Services Research, 21(1), Article 1193. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07240-3
Avendano-Uribe, B. E., Lombana-Bermudez, A., Flórez, L. V., Chaparro, E., Hernandez-Morales, A. C., Archbold, J., Buitrago-Casas, J. C., & Porras, A. M. (2022). Engaging Scientific Diasporas in STEAM Education: The Case of Science Clubs Colombia [Article]. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 7, Article 898167. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.898167
Berkman, P. A. (2020). Science diplomacy and its engine of informed decisionmaking: Operating through our global pandemic with humanity [Article]. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(3), 435-450. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10034
Berkman, P. A., Kullerud, L., Pope, A., Vylegzhanin, A. N., & Young, O. R. (2017). The Arctic Science Agreement propels science diplomacy [Review]. Science, 358(6363), 596-598. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0890
Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-Word Analysis as a Tool for Describing the Network of Interactions between Basic and Technological Research: The Case of Polymer Chemestry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155- 205.
Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02019280
Das, J., Forlini, C., Porcello, D. M., Rommelfanger, K. S., & Salles, A. (2022). Neuroscience is ready for neuroethics engagement [Article]. Frontiers in Communication, 7, Article 909964. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.909964
Everett, K., & Halasková, B. (2022). Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states' strategies. Polar Record, 58, 14, Article e27. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247422000183
Fähnrich, B. (2017). Science diplomacy: Investigating the perspective of scholars on politics–science collaboration in international affairs [Article]. Public Understanding of Science, 26(6), 688-703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515616552
Fedoroff, N. V. (2009). Science diplomacy in the 21st century. Cell, 136(1), 9-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.030
Flink, T. (2020). The Sensationalist Discourse of Science Diplomacy: A Critical Reflection. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(3), 359-370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10032
Flink, T., & Kaldewey, D. (2018). The new production of legitimacy: STI policy discourses beyond the contract metaphor. Research Policy, 47(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.008
Flink, T., & Schreiterer, U. (2010). Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: toward a typology of national approaches. Science and Public Policy, 37(9), 665-677. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210x12778118264530
Fuentes, M., Cárdenas, J. P., Olivares, G., Rasmussen, E., Salazar, S., Urbina, C., Vidal, G., & Lawler, D. (2023). Global Digital Analysis for Science Diplomacy on Climate Change and Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 15(22), 19, Article 15747. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215747
Fuentes, M., Cárdenas, J. P., Urbina, C., Vidal, G., Olivares, G., Lawler, D., Azocar, E. B., & Rasmussen, E. (2023). Alignment between United Nations Environmental Assembly Guidance and National Research Priorities. Sustainability, 15(3), 25, Article 2636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032636
Fuentes, M., Cárdenas, J. P., Urbina, C., Vidal, G., Olivares, G., Lawler, D., Bustos Azocar, E., & Rasmussen, E. (2023). Alignment between United Nations Environmental Assembly Guidance and National Research Priorities [Article]. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3), Article 2636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032636
Goodsite, M. E., Bertelsen, R. G., Cassotta Pertoldi-Bianchi, S., Ren, J., van der Watt, L. M., & Johannsson, H. (2016). The role of science diplomacy: a historical development and international legal framework of arctic research stations under conditions of climate change, post-cold war geopolitics and globalization/power transition [Article]. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6(4), 645-661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0329-6
Harden-Davies, H. (2018). The next wave of science diplomacy: Marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction [Article]. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 75(1), 426-434. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx165
Hotez, P. J. (2015). Vaccine Science Diplomacy: Expanding Capacity to Prevent Emerging and Neglected Tropical Diseases Arising from Islamic State (IS)–Held Territories [Article]. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 9(9), Article e0003852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003852
Kontar, Y. Y., Ismail-Zadeh, A., Berkman, P. A., Duda, P. I., Gluckman, S. P., Kelman, I., & Murray, V. (2021). Knowledge exchange through science diplomacy to assist disaster risk reduction [Article]. Progress in Disaster Science, 11, Article 100188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100188
Mercer, J. L., Nymand, J., Culler, L. E., Lynge, R., Lund, S., Gregersen, B., Makens, B., Virginia, R. A., & Moore, K. G. (2022). Bilateral collaboration between the Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat) and United States Research Communities - from a vision to everyday practice [Article]. Polar Record, 58(1), Article e42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247422000298
Miranda, D. G. (2021). GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE? COOPERATION AND CONFLICT IN THE POST-HEGEMONIC ERA: FACING THE PANDEMIC CRISIS [Article]. Analele Universitatii din Bucuresti, Seria Stiinte Politice, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.54885/SKXA9141
Nye, J. (2017). Soft power: the origins and political progress of a concept. Palgrave Communications, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.8
Ritch Iii, J. B. (1999). Nuclear green: Perspectives on science, diplomacy and atoms for peace [Review]. IAEA Bulletin, 41(2), 2. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77950434535&partnerID=40&md5=5d1c1630336ad3169a5e7ba033fc0420
Robinson, S., Adamson, M., Barrett, G., Jacobsen, L. L., Turchetti, S., Homei, A., Marton, P., Aronowsky, L., Choudry, I., Gärdebo, J., Hyun, J., Ienna, G., Kinyanjui, C., Martínez-Rius, B., Mascarello, J., Olsakova, D., Rispoli, G., & Zaidi, W. (2023). The globalization of science diplomacy in the early 1970s: A historical exploration [Article]. Science and Public Policy, 50(4), 749-758. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad026
Rüffin, N., & Rüland, A. L. (2022). Between global collaboration and national competition: Unraveling the many faces of Arctic science diplomacy [Review]. Polar Record, 58(1), Article 200015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247422000158
Ruffini, P.-B. (2020). Conceptualizing science diplomacy in the practitioner-driven literature: a critical review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00609-5
Ruffini, P. B. (2020). Collaboration and competition: The twofold logic of science diplomacy [Article]. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(3), 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10028
Schlegel, F., Jacot, O., & Fetscherin, M. (2011). Science diplomacy with swissnex China: A Swiss nation brand initiative [Article]. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 7(4), 289-298. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2011.14
Smith, F. L. (2014). Advancing science diplomacy: Indonesia and the US Naval Medical Research Unit [Article]. Social Studies of Science, 44(6), 825-847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714535864
Society, T. R. (2010). New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy: Navigating the Changing Balance of Power. T. R. Society.
Stone, D. (2019). Making global policy [Book]. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108661690
Suttmeier, R. P. (2010). From Cold War science diplomacy to partnering in a networked world: 30 years of Sino-US relations in science and technology [Article]. Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, 1(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/17585521011032522
Turekian, V. (2018). The Evolution of Science Diplomacy [Article]. Global Policy, 9, 5-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12622
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
