Challenges to Dignity and Human Communication: The Deep Configuration of Abuse and Institutional Violence

Authors

Keywords:

institutional abuse, fear, awareness, communication, human dignity.

Abstract

The article analyzes the need to promote humane and dignified communication in the context of the current polycrisis, starting from an examination of the origins of institutional abuse and the social engineering that sustains it. The main objective is to understand the mechanisms that configure institutional violence by addressing its objectives, interests, and needs through three analytical axes: power in its ideological, remunerative, and punitive dimensions; domination, understood as the vertical division of labor based on exploitation, fragmentation, and penetration; and the culture of fear, which operates through submission and dependency. This framework is embedded in a bureaucratic, communicative, and techno-feudal model that functions as a structural pattern shaping both public and private institutions.The methodology adopted is theoretical and critical in nature, grounded in structural power analysis and development theory, articulated through the dichotomies exploitation/equity, fragmentation/solidarity, and penetration/autonomy. The study identifies institutions permeated by multiple forms of violence direct, indirect, cultural, symbolic, and structural whose effects may be either visible or invisible.A second objective of the paper is to explore alternatives for the construction of more horizontal, humane, and relational institutional models, both at the intrainstitutional level and in interactions with the populations served. It is argued that a profound understanding of institutional violence is a necessary condition for raising awareness and for the recovery of human dignity.The article concludes that a form of social engineering oriented toward a dignified humanity through peaceful means requires addressing the psychosomatic dimensions of violence trauma, guilt, revenge, reciprocity, and irreversibility in order to intervene in norms of reciprocity and to break the vicious cycle of vengeance. Awareness and peaceful communication are thus established as essential dimensions at all levels of transformative action.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Calderón, P. (2016). Hacia una teoría de la violencia. En F.A. Caviglia, A. Ferrazano, E. González-Calleja, G.P. Rodríguez-Montenegro, E.M. del Percio, et al (Eds.), La medusa en el espejo Ensayos sobre la violencia contemporánea. (pp. 16-178). Edit Ciccus. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/109185

Cuesta, M. (2025). La venganza del niño interior. Plataforma Editorial

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogia del oprimido. Siglo XXI Editores.

Galtung, J. (1973). La comunidad europea: una superpotencia en marcha. Ediciones Nueva Visión.

Galtung, J. (1981). Social cosmology and the concept of peace. Journal of Peace Research, 18(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433810180020

Galtung, J. (1998). Tras la violencia, 3R: reconstrucción, reconciliación, resolución: afrontando los efectos visibles e invisibles de la guerra y la violencia. Gernika Gogoratuz.

Galtung, J. (2003a). Paz por medios pacíficos: paz y conflicto, desarrollo y civilización. Bakeaz / Gernika Gogoratuz.

Galtung, J. (2003b). Violencia Cultural, Revista Gernika-Lumo, 14. https://www.gernikagogoratuz.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/doc-14-violencia-cultural.pdf

Galtung, J. (2004). Transcend and Transform: An Introduction to Conflict Work (Peace by Peaceful Means). Pluto Press. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/03058298060340021710

Galtung, J. (2012). A Theory of Peace: Building Direct, Structural and Cultural Peace. Transcend University Press.

Galtung, J. (2016). La violenciacultural, estructural y directa. Revista Cuadernos de estrategia, 183, 147-168. (Ejemplar dedicado a: Política y violencia: comprensión teórica y desarrollo en la acción colectiva). https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5832797

Hernández, D. A. (2019). Nociones de paz: una revisión teórica del concepto. Ciudad Paz-ando, 12(1), 78-88. doi: https://doi.org/10.14483/2422278X.13951

Hermoso, M. J. y Aguirre, J. C. (2009). Crisis: una perspectiva helénica. Krisis, p. 255. Editorial Kairós.

López, M. (2012). NOVIOLENCIA Teoría, acción política y experiencias. Edicatori. https://www.ugr.es/~mariol/files/publicaciones/libros/1.pdf

Martínez, B. (2024). Los cinco ejes en el pensamiento de Johan Galtung: Cosmología, Conflicto, Violencia y Paz. Dykinson. https://doi.org/10.14679/3433

Pearce, J. V. (23 de octubre de 2025). Intervención verbal Cuerpo vulnerable y sujeto participativo: reimaginar la agencia para la paz desde la experiencia encarnada. II Foro Internacional de Paz. Granada, España. https://unamosculturas.org/programa-del-foro/

Pérez-Fernández, J. M. (2023). Maestría de la mayéutica Socrática.: El arte del dialogo transformador. Independently published.

Published

2026-10-10

How to Cite

Martínez-Pérez, B. (2026). Challenges to Dignity and Human Communication: The Deep Configuration of Abuse and Institutional Violence. Libraries. Research Annals, 22(No. Especial), 1–11. Retrieved from https://revistasbnjm.sld.cu/index.php/BAI/article/view/1124