This is an outdated version published on 2026-09-14. Read the most recent version.

Using 3D printing and ai for multisensory communication in Ibero-Latin america: a systematic review

Authors

Keywords:

3D printing; AI; visual impairment; multisensory communication

Abstract

Objective. To produce a transparent and reproducible map of Ibero-Latin American research at the intersection of 3D printing, artificial intelligence (AI), and accessibility for blind and low-vision publics in communication contexts, while also determining whether a coherent body of work simultaneously integrating all three axes exists. Design/Methodology/Approach. A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 recommendations. Searches were performed in Scopus and Web of Science in November 2025, using affiliation criteria covering Latin America, Portugal, or Spain, English-language publications, and a substantive link to at least two of the three focal domains. Because the fully conjunctive query returned no records, the strategy was fragmented into six complementary searches. Results/Discussion. The evidence shows a fragmented but increasingly convergent field. Scopus concentrates studies on tactile representation, inclusive design, and emerging AI-assisted workflows, whereas Web of Science provides a broader technological ecosystem involving additive manufacturing, materials, and automation. Spain and Brazil recur as leading contributors, and publication activity is strongly concentrated between 2022 and 2025. Conclusions. No studies were identified that fully combine accessibility, 3D printing, and AI, revealing an interdisciplinary gap and a need for shared metrics, repositories, and workflows. Contribution/Originality/Value. The review organizes a dispersed research landscape and identifies opportunities to integrate digital fabrication, AI, and multisensory communication through a socially grounded and inclusive approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Burgstahler, S. (2015). Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice (2nd ed.). Harvard Education Press.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Shinohara, K., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2016). Self-conscious or self-confident? A diary study conceptualizing the social accessibility of assistive technology. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 8(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2827857

Voultsiou, E., & Moussiades, L. (2025). A systematic review of AI, VR, and LLM applications in special education: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 19141–19181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13550-4

World Health Organization. (2019). World report on vision. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/world-report-on-vision

World Health Organization. (2023). Blindness and vision impairment. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment

Zhao, Y., Nacenta, M. A., Sukhai, M. A., & Somanath, S. (2024). TADA: Making node-link diagrams accessible to blind and low-vision people. Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Article 45, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642222

Downloads

Published

2026-09-14

Versions

How to Cite

Lisboa Empinotti, M., & Ba;dessar, M. J. (2026). Using 3D printing and ai for multisensory communication in Ibero-Latin america: a systematic review. Libraries. Research Annals, 22(2), 1–10. Retrieved from https://revistasbnjm.sld.cu/index.php/BAI/article/view/1159